PDA

View Full Version : Study: Women lead men in bacteria, hands down


comicfan
11-05-2008, 12:01 PM
Makes you wonder.....


WASHINGTON – Wash your hands, folks, especially you ladies. A new study found that women have a greater variety of bacteria on their hands than men do. And everybody has more types of bacteria than the researchers expected to find.
"One thing that really is astonishing is the variability between individuals, and also between hands on the same individual," said University of Colorado biochemistry assistant professor Rob Knight, a co-author of the paper.
"The sheer number of bacteria species detected on the hands of the study participants was a big surprise, and so was the greater diversity of bacteria we found on the hands of women," added lead researcher Noah Fierer, an assistant professor in Colorado's department of ecology and evolutionary biology.
The researchers aren't sure why women harbored a greater variety of bacteria than men, but Fierer suggested it may have to so with the acidity of the skin. Knight said men generally have more acidic skin than women.
Other possibilities are differences in sweat and oil gland production between men and women, the frequency of moisturizer or cosmetics applications, skin thickness or hormone production, he said.
Women also may have more bacteria living under the surface of the skin where they are not accessible to washing, Knight added.
Asked if guys should worry about holding hands with girls, Knight said: "I guess it depends on which girl."
He stressed that "the vast majority of the bacteria we have on our body are either harmless or beneficial ... the pathogens are a small minority."
The researchers took samples from the palms of 51 college students — that's 102 hands — and tested the samples using a new, highly detailed system for detecting bacteria DNA.
They identified 4,742 species of bacteria overall, only 5 of which were on every hand, they report on Monday's online edition of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
The average hand harbored 150 species of bacteria.
Not only did individuals have few types of bacteria in common, the left and right hands of the same individual shared only about 17 percent of the same bacteria types, the researchers found.
The differences between dominant and non-dominant hands were probably due to environmental conditions like oil production, salinity, moisture or variable environmental surfaces touched by either hand of an individual, Fierer said.
Knight said the researchers hope to repeat the experiment in other countries where different hands are assigned specific tasks.
While the researchers stressed the importance of regular hand washing, they also noted that washing did not eliminate bacteria.
"Either the bacterial colonies rapidly re-establish after hand washing, or washing (as practiced by the students included in this study) does not remove the majority of bacteria taxa found on the skin surface," the researchers said in their report.
While the tests could determine how many different types of bacteria were present, they could not count the total amount of bacteria on each hand.
The research was funded primarily by the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation



Link: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081104/ap_on_sc/sci_dirty_hands

Kerjack
11-05-2008, 12:18 PM
I wash my hands on average 10 times a day I'm guessing. Wonder if getting your hands dirty helps too. I mean it strips most if the all the oil from the hands and it can be quite abrasive, I would wager that as long as you wash your hands after then they come out cleaner because of it.

Morfin
11-05-2008, 12:29 PM
Women are dirty. Mother said so. She told me to stay away from them. Mother was right, see? They're bad. Filthy whores. That's what Mother said. Dirty. Foul. Better to stay at home. With Mother. She's clean.

Archangel
11-05-2008, 12:32 PM
What rubbish. Ooh bacteria. We've been living in symbiontic relationships with the little buggers for millions of years now, and apparently, people have a shitload of them on their bodies and function quite normally.

So what's the fucking point of this?

WigglingWii
11-05-2008, 12:32 PM
The sample was 51? Come on. That is not enough to make this research conclusive. Plus, they're not mentioning the hour of the day they're obtaining the samples. I call bogus on this research. I remember there was another research that came out a while ago concluding that men don't wash their hands after using the bathroom. So these two researches are obviously conflicting.

Gary_Busey
11-05-2008, 12:40 PM
They don't need a study on this. Everyone knows girls have cooties.

comicfan
11-05-2008, 12:41 PM
It actually is quite funny to see what kind of research is being published in scientific journals these days. I agree with Wii on this one... a sample size of 51 is just way to small, and it is really hard to standardize the situation when you are going to swab the individuals.

Limp
11-05-2008, 12:41 PM
Circle circle, dot dot!

Pox
11-05-2008, 12:42 PM
They don't need a study on this. Everyone knows girls have cooties.
I'd be worried about this, but I got my circle circle dot dot a while ago.

edit: fuck.

WigglingWii
11-05-2008, 12:42 PM
It actually is quite funny to see what kind of research is being published in scientific journals these days. I agree with Wii on this one... a sample size of 51 is just way to small, and it is really hard to standardize the situation when you are going to swab the individuals.

It's quite sad that the media picks up on stupid studies like these instead of the ones that are very innovative. I think they're trying to dumb things down for the people.

ruffdog
11-05-2008, 12:43 PM
dirty hoes

comicfan
11-05-2008, 12:46 PM
It's quite sad that the media picks up on stupid studies like these instead of the ones that are very innovative. I think they're trying to dumb things down for the people.

I think it is too hard for the media to go through real research articles to see the value in what they are doing. It is sad really, as money for research is now tied to what is "the big thing" these days, and now that this study has been picked up on the news feeds, I bet the researchers are now going to get more funding to do more idiotic studies like this!

Kerjack
11-05-2008, 12:49 PM
I've done my research and concluded Wii is a class A tease.

Friday
11-05-2008, 05:15 PM
He stressed that "the vast majority of the bacteria we have on our body are either harmless or beneficial."

Seems like it was a study conducted by University of Colorado biochemistry 101 students.

riseabove!
11-05-2008, 06:26 PM
I'm net stressed because I fucking own bacteria. My ammune system got that shit on lockdown

Morfin
11-05-2008, 06:30 PM
I'm net stressed because I fucking own bacteria. My ammune system got that shit on lockdown

Apparently your typing skills are on lockdown as well.

DeMartini Sands
11-06-2008, 07:17 PM
I've lived w/ a few chicks that can fuck a bathroom up!!!!