PDA

View Full Version : Logic Test


Morfin
01-06-2009, 10:39 AM
I got 100%. Yee-haw!

http://www.think-logically.co.uk/lt.htm

moe_blunts
01-06-2009, 11:15 AM
I got 100% as well. Yay philosophy majors.

janois
01-06-2009, 12:45 PM
100%. I would say I was a genius but I just spent 10 seconds looking for the percent sign on the keyboard.

STDSkillz
01-06-2009, 01:16 PM
I got a 100%, and I'm a stupid math major.

redsox39
01-06-2009, 01:26 PM
I got a 93%, but my excuse was written for me at the bottom:

Invalid but controversial in philosophical circles. If one defines water as a property that contains two atoms of hydrogen and one atom of oxygen only, then the argument above is valid. However, it is possible also that there may exist a substance that looks like water, boils as water, freezes as water, nourishes plants and life as water, and yet has a different chemical composition to what we know as water. There is nothing that could logically prevent this possibility occurring so the argument then becomes invalid.

SO blah! Not a hard test. I bet Tater's gets a 25% because barking ducks are Racist!

Morfin
01-06-2009, 01:44 PM
You didn't get 100%.

http://img2.abload.de/img/simpsons_nelson_haha2uwr.jpg

But we <smrmrf, giggle> respect <giggle, srfmf> your honesty.

redsox39
01-06-2009, 02:03 PM
Shit...I am lying next time...

Willam
01-07-2009, 05:18 AM
I got a 93%, but my excuse was written for me at the bottom:

Invalid but controversial in philosophical circles. If one defines water as a property that contains two atoms of hydrogen and one atom of oxygen only, then the argument above is valid. However, it is possible also that there may exist a substance that looks like water, boils as water, freezes as water, nourishes plants and life as water, and yet has a different chemical composition to what we know as water. There is nothing that could logically prevent this possibility occurring so the argument then becomes invalid.

SO blah! Not a hard test. I bet Tater's gets a 25% because barking ducks are Racist!


I missed the same one. 14/15 overall though.

Datači
01-07-2009, 05:26 AM
220%

Archetype
01-07-2009, 06:01 AM
Question 14 is relative to your view of "overall." If you believe the value of the top performers exceeds the value of the rest enough, then the bottom feeders' results wouldn't be enough to undermine the achievers. Shakespearre does not get completely offset by an illiterate from Australia.

Mustard
01-07-2009, 06:03 AM
100. Holy shit this was an easy test.

smith42687
01-07-2009, 06:09 AM
100%. More like Cake test.

freegood
01-10-2009, 03:50 PM
I missed the murder case one. Must've thought Mary was black.

the creeps
01-10-2009, 04:01 PM
12 is stupid it doesn't give you a full answer,