View Full Version : Worst state in the NFL?
Genius
09-23-2008, 03:05 PM
Ohio, 0-6.
(Cleveland 0-3, Cincinnati 0-3)
Missouri, 0-6.
(St. Louis 0-3, Kansas City 0-3)
Poop Sailboat
09-23-2008, 03:06 PM
ouch.
Missouri is waaayyyy worse btw
ShitBreak
09-23-2008, 03:08 PM
I thought the Chiefs played on the Kansas-side of KC?
Anyways, at least the Rams have been extremely good in the past 10 years. Ohio teams...not so much.
Pollo
09-23-2008, 03:08 PM
no tie option?
The Dude
09-23-2008, 03:08 PM
all of the states without teams?
ShitBreak
09-23-2008, 03:08 PM
OKLAHOMA!!!1
Genius
09-23-2008, 03:09 PM
no tie option?
I thought about it, or make it multiple choice. But I wanted to challenge the voting populace.
The Dude
09-23-2008, 03:09 PM
I thought about it, or make it multiple choice. But I wanted to challenge the voting populace.
more like "worse" state
Poop Sailboat
09-23-2008, 03:09 PM
sorry, browns.
*cries and votes for ohio*
Genius
09-23-2008, 03:10 PM
all of the states without teams?
I'd rather have no team than deal with the garbage that the Rams have put on the field.
Poop Sailboat
09-23-2008, 03:10 PM
http://forum.gorillamask.net/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gifOff-Topic I (http://forum.gorillamask.net/showthread.php?p=133646#post133646) 09-23-2008 03:53 PMMuji (http://forum.gorillamask.net/member.php?u=18) the browns make baby jesus cry
Genius
09-23-2008, 03:11 PM
I'd rather have no team than deal with the garbage that the Rams have put on the field.
Ok, I take that back. But damn if I wouldn't feel it if my team was ever THAT fucking dreadful.
Missouri. The Browns have some talent and the Bengals have Chad Ocho Cinco, Palmer, and the cast of "The Longest Yard".
Hanover Fist
09-23-2008, 03:14 PM
Ohio would go undefeated against Missouri and cover the spread every game.
VoxAngelikus
09-23-2008, 03:15 PM
Ohio. Simply because of the Browns.
Even when they were good (waaay back in the day), I could never get over the fact that their team name was the Browns. That's like being called the Shitstains. What an awful name, and what an awful city. Fuck you, Cleveland.
You gotta go with Ohio. At least KC had successful seasons years back and actually made a to some Super Bowls.
Missouri. At least they have Mizzou. They could probably beat the Rams and Chiefs.
Genius
09-23-2008, 03:17 PM
Chase Daniel could start for every team in Missouri, and there really wouldn't be much question about it. Come to think of it, I'll be kind of surprised if he isn't starting for one of those teams next year.
Missouri. The Browns have some talent and the Bengals have Chad Ocho Cinco, Palmer, and the cast of "The Longest Yard".
To me that makes the case for Ohio. At least Missouri can say they don't have the talent to be good. It's a shame that you have the talent and still can't produce.
Morfin
09-23-2008, 03:24 PM
Michigan. We have only the 0-3 Lions so we can't compete with the 0-6 states, but I say quality of craptasticness trumps quantity.
kevin6387
09-23-2008, 03:27 PM
Chase Daniel could start for every team in Missouri, and there really wouldn't be much question about it. Come to think of it, I'll be kind of surprised if he isn't starting for one of those teams next year.
Chase Daniel won't translate to an NFL team. You do realize he has never had to learn a new system. Pinkel changed Mizzou's offense to the exact system that Daniel used in high school. He is incredibly efficient in that system, but has never had to change out of it. That's a huge risk in a team taking an undersized QB who has only operated under 1 system his entire career.
He will be a 4th-5th round pick and disappear.
The Dude
09-23-2008, 03:29 PM
I'm gonna go with hawaii.
Nowhere close to any team or any chance of a live game.
Even the 4:15 games are at 10:15 in the morning...I DON'T WANT MY FOOTBALL UNTIL AFTER 12 NOON DAMNIT!
Da Raider
09-23-2008, 03:31 PM
Missouri teams are crappola this year. The Bengals and Browns have a shot to right the ship and pull out 6 wins a peice. The Chiefs and Rams won't win 6 total between them.
kevin6387
09-23-2008, 03:31 PM
I don't want KC to win games. I want Herm Edwards and Carl Peterson gone, and a #1 draft pick. I hope they continue to suck.
hatepoppy
09-23-2008, 03:32 PM
in all things, missouri is worse than all other places.
hatepoppy
09-23-2008, 03:33 PM
Michigan. We have only the 0-3 Lions so we can't compete with the 0-6 states, but I say quality of craptasticness trumps quantity.def more consistently crappy.
who's got more losses over the last five years, michigan or missouri?
Genius
09-23-2008, 03:34 PM
Chase Daniel won't translate to an NFL team. You do realize he has never had to learn a new system. Pinkel changed Mizzou's offense to the exact system that Daniel used in high school. He is incredibly efficient in that system, but has never had to change out of it. That's a huge risk in a team taking an undersized QB who has only operated under 1 system his entire career.
He will be a 4th-5th round pick and disappear.
I'd be happy to have him over the loser fucks that Kiper has in his Top 5.
hatepoppy
09-23-2008, 03:37 PM
btw, 03 - 07, detroit has 54 losses. kansas city and st louis have 78 combined.
Hanover Fist
09-23-2008, 03:50 PM
No team is even close to the Rams this year in PF and PA. I think even the Lions are +36 compared to the Rams so far.
Mustard
09-23-2008, 03:55 PM
They may suck almost every year, but I've always liked the Bengals since I was a kid.
Genius
09-23-2008, 04:10 PM
They may suck almost every year, but I've always liked the Bengals since I was a kid.
David Klingler, Ki-Jana Carter, Dan Wilkinson, Darnay Scott, Carl Pickens, Jeff Blake, Corey Dillon, and ESPECIALLY Akili Smith certainly appreciate the sentiment.
TheImpossibleMan
09-23-2008, 05:03 PM
Right now, Mizz by a mile.
All time, Ohio.
Voted Mizz.
chipsahoy
09-23-2008, 06:24 PM
Being a Bengal fan I have to ask, where the fuck is the Arizona option. Talk about worthless NFL state.
And if this logic holds true for the 0-3 teams that means New York > Texas.
Cant argue NY 7-2 > TX 3-2.
Genius
09-23-2008, 06:31 PM
Arizona has been to the playoffs almost as many times as Ohio has in the past two decades.
Edit: And have one more playoff win, since 1990.
Double Edit: Ok, ok, the state of Ohio is tied with the state of Arizona in playoff wins since 1990.
Soup Nazi
09-23-2008, 06:32 PM
Being a Bengal fan I have to ask, where the fuck is the Arizona option. Talk about worthless NFL state.
And if this logic holds true for the 0-3 teams that means New York > Texas.
Cant argue NY 7-2 > TX 3-2.
Actually if you want to get technical, New York is only 3-0 this season.
chipsahoy
09-23-2008, 06:51 PM
Arizona has been to the playoffs almost as many times as Ohio has in the past two decades.
Edit: And have one more playoff win, since 1990.
Double Edit: Ok, ok, the state of Ohio is tied with the state of Arizona in playoff wins since 1990.
thats not 2 decades.
2 decades is 1988-2008
Cincinnati won 2 and made it to the SB in 88. Went again in 1990 but lost in wildcard.
Cleveland went to the playoffs in 1988, 89, 94, 2002, winning 1 game in 89 and 94
Arizona, 1 playoff win in 1998. The Cardinals have not had a winning season since their 1998 playoff appearance.
How does 2 playoff wins (OH) = 1 win (AZ) since 90?
chipsahoy
09-23-2008, 06:55 PM
Actually if you want to get technical, New York is only 3-0 this season.
I think I would rather NY > TX if I was from texas but to say NJ > TX thats just so wrong. yet its true since you want to get technical.
Da Raider
09-23-2008, 07:00 PM
Actually if you want to get technical, New York is only 3-0 this season.
Plus they have two "home" games in Toronto.
Da Raider
09-23-2008, 07:01 PM
Best state for football is California. 7 Super Bowl titles.
Genius
09-23-2008, 07:01 PM
thats not 2 decades.
2 decades is 1988-2008
Cincinnati won 2 and made it to the SB in 88. Went again in 1990 but lost in wildcard.
Cleveland went to the playoffs in 1988, 89, 94, 2002, winning 1 game in 89 and 94
Arizona, 1 playoff win in 1998. The Cardinals have not had a winning season since their 1998 playoff appearance.
How does 2 playoff wins (OH) = 1 win (AZ) since 90?
Still, I think this statement is pretty ridiculous.
Being a Bengal fan I have to ask, where the fuck is the Arizona option. Talk about worthless NFL state.
Da Raider
09-23-2008, 07:05 PM
only teams to never make the Super Bowl:
Arizona
Cleveland
Jacksonville
Houston
Detroit
New Orleans
Satan
09-23-2008, 07:07 PM
Browns and Bengals are both capable of being better. I don't think the Rams or the Chiefs are getting better anytime this year.
chipsahoy
09-23-2008, 07:17 PM
Still, I think this statement is pretty ridiculous.
Sucks to be wrong doesn't it.
Want a good laugh
http://home.ntelos.net/~blades/BudLightPresents.mp3
Poop Sailboat
09-23-2008, 08:37 PM
we have nfl championships!
eleveneighteen
09-24-2008, 02:18 PM
honorable mention: California.
Save it, chargers fans. All that talent and can't win the big game.
Hawk the Slayer
09-24-2008, 06:27 PM
I live in St. Louis, and grew up in KC. The correct answer is "Missouri". Whereas KC is just your average, ordinary "bad team in the process of rebuilding through youth", the Lambs are HISTORICALLY bad. Linehan is a disaster. The front office is a joke. Marc Bulger has "Jeff George syndrome" (anyone who watched the early-90's Colts knows what I'm talking about... it's a variant of PTSD particular to QB's with putrid offensive lines), Stephen Jackson is a crybaby, the defense can't tackle anyone... I am predicting an 0-16 finish for the Rams. They're that bad. Chiefs, probably right around 3-13, maybe 2-14. The Browns and Bengals will have at least 8 combined wins by the end of the year, probably more.
chaos2015
09-24-2008, 11:18 PM
the rams are the worst team in the nfl by a long shot
moofpiosu
09-25-2008, 03:32 PM
Great thing about this is, even the winner is still a loser
lce-man
09-25-2008, 05:15 PM
My vote's for the two Missouri teams too, definitely the worst.
john750sradd
10-08-2008, 11:51 AM
both but can only vote for 1
twisterf5
10-14-2008, 01:00 PM
has to be ohio
twisterf5
10-14-2008, 01:00 PM
the browns left for the maryland and the bengals have sucked forever