PDA

View Full Version : Powell's Interview on Meet the Press


Okie Medicvet
10-21-2008, 07:40 PM
I saw his interview, and then read the transcript, and as far as I am concerned, he is right on the money with what he is saying. He talked about what is coming up for the future of America during and after the election, and explains why he is voting for Obama instead of McCain. Here is part of the interview, with the rest being on the link provided:

: Below is the "Meet the Press" Transcript for Sunday, Oct. 19 -- if used, mandatory credit: NBC News' "Meet the Press"
MR. TOM BROKAW: Our issues this Sunday: He served as President George W. Bush's Secretary of State and was once called the man most likely to become the nation's first African- American president. He has been courted by both the Obama and McCain presidential campaigns and said this last month:

(Videotape)
GEN. COLIN POWELL (RET.): I have been watching both of these individuals. I know them both extremely well, and I have not decided who I'm going to vote for yet.(End videotape)

MR. BROKAW: Is he now ready to make an endorsement in this presidential race? What are his thoughts on the major issues facing the country and the world? Our exclusive guest this Sunday, former Secretary of State General Colin Powell.Then, with 16 days to go, Decision 2008 heads into the home stretch. What states still are in play? We will hear the latest on some new state polls with NBC's political director, Chuck Todd. Also, insights and analysis on the race to the White House with David Brooks of The New York Times, Jon Meacham of Newsweek magazine, Andrea Mitchell of NBC News, and Joe Scarborough of MSNBC's "Morning Joe."
But first, General Colin Powell, welcome back to MEET THE PRESS.

GEN. POWELL: Thank, thank you, Tom.

MR. BROKAW: We indicated in that opening, there is a lot of anticipation and speculation about your take on this presidential campaign. We'll get to that in a moment. But in your old business we might call this a tour of the horizon. Whoever's elected president of the United States, that first day in the Oval Office on January 21st will face this: an American economy that's in a near paralytic state at this time; we're at war in two different countries, Afghanistan and Iraq; we have an energy crisis; we have big decisions to make about health care and about global climate change. The president of the United States and the Congress of the United States now have the highest disapproval ratings that we have seen in many years. In all your years of public service, have you ever seen an incoming president face such daunting challenges?

GEN. POWELL: No. I have seen more difficult times in our history. I think about the early '70s when we were going through Watergate, Spiro Agnew, Nixon period, that was not a good time. But right now we're also facing a very daunting period. And I think the number one issue the president's going to have to deal with is the economy. That's what the American people are worried about. And, frankly, it's not just an American problem, it's an international problem. We can see how all of these economies are now linked in this globalized system. And I think that'll be number one. The president will also have to make decisions quickly as to how to deal with Iraq and Afghanistan. And also I think the president has to reach out to the world and show that there is a new president, a new administration that is looking forward to working with our friends and
allies. And in my judgment, also willing to talk to people who we have not been willing to talk to before. Because this is a time for outreach.

MR. BROKAW: Given the state of the American economy, can we continue our militarycommitments around the world at the level that they now exist?

GEN. POWELL: We can. I think we have to look as to whether they have to be at that level. But we have the wealth, we have the wherewithal to do that. (Clears throat) Excuse me, Tom. We have the ability to do that. And so, first and foremost, we have to review those commitments, see what they are, see what else is needed, and make sure we give our troops what they need to get the job done as we have defined the job. We have that ability.

MR. BROKAW: If you were called into the Oval Office on January 21st by the new president, whoever it happens to be, and he said to you, "General Powell, I need from you your recommendation on where I begin. What should be my priorities?" Where would you start?

GEN. POWELL: I would start with talking to the American people and talking to the world, and conveying a new image of American leadership, a new image of America's role in the world. The problems will always be there, and there's going to be a crisis come along in the 21st or 22nd of January that we don't even know about right now. And so I think what the president has to do is to start using the power of the Oval Office and the power of his personality to convince the American people and to convince the world that America is solid, America is going to move forward, and we're going to fix our economic problems, we're going to meet our overseas obligations. But restoring a sense of purpose, a sense of confidence in the American people and, in the international community, in America.

MR. BROKAW: What's not on the screen right now that concerns you that should be more prominent in the minds of the American people and the people running for president?

GEN. POWELL: I think the American people and the gentlemen running for president will have to, early on, focus on education more than we have seen in the campaign so far. America has a terrible educational problem in the sense that we have too many youngsters not finishing school. A third of our kids don't finish high school, 50 percent of minorities don't finish high school. We've got to work on this, and my, my wife and I are leading a campaign with this purpose. Also, I think, the new president has to realize that the world looks to America for leadership, and so we have to show leadership on some issues that the world is expecting us to, whether it's energy, global warming and the environment. And I think we have to do a lot more with respect to poverty alleviation and helping the needy people of the world. We need to increase the amount of resources we put into our development programs to help the rest of the world. Because when you help the poorest in the world, you start to move them up an economic and social ladder, and they're not going to be moving toward violence or terrorism of the kind that weworry about.

MR. BROKAW: Well, let's move to the American presidential campaign now, if we can. We saw at the beginning of this broadcast a short tease of what you had to say just a month ago. Let's share with our viewers now a little more of Colin Powell on these two candidates and your position.

(Videotape, September 20, 2008)
GEN. POWELL: I'm an American, first and foremost, and I'm very proud--I said, I've said, I've said to my beloved friend and colleague John McCain, a friend of 25 years, "John, I love you, but I'm not just going to vote for you on the basis of our affection or friendship." And I've said to Barack Obama, "I admire you. I'll give you all the advice I can. But I'm not going to vote for you just because you're black." We, we have to move beyond this.
(End videotape)

MR. BROKAW: General Powell, actually you gave a campaign contribution to Senator McCain. You have met twice at least with Barack Obama. Are you prepared to make a public declaration of which of these two candidates that you're prepared to support?

GEN. POWELL: Yes, but let me lead into it this way. I know both of these
individuals very well now. I've known John for 25 years as your setup said. And I've gotten to know Mr. Obama quite well over the past two years. Both of them are distinguished Americans who are patriotic, who are dedicated to the welfare of our country. Either one of them, I think, would be a good president. I have said to Mr. McCain that I admire all he has done. I have some concerns about the direction that the party has taken in recent years. It has moved more to the right than I would like to see it, but that's a choice the party makes. And I've said to Mr. Obama, "You have to pass a test of do you have enough experience, and do you bring the judgment to the table that would give us confidence that you would be a good president." And I've watched him over the past two years, frankly, and I've had this conversation with him. I have especially watched over the last six of seven weeks as both of them have really taken a final exam with respect to this economic crisis that we are in and coming out of the conventions. And I must say that I've gotten a good measure of both. In the case of Mr. McCain, I found that he was a little unsure as to deal with the economic problems that we were having and almost every day there was a different approach to the problem. And that concerned me, sensing that he didn't have a complete grasp of the economic problems that we had. And I was also concerned at theselection of Governor Palin. She's a very distinguished woman, and she's to be admired; but at the same time, now that we have had a chance to watch her for some seven weeks, I don't believe she's ready to be president of the United States, which is the job of the vice president. And so that raised some question in my mind as to the judgment that Senator McCain made.

On the Obama side, I watched Mr. Obama and I watched him during this seven-week period. And he displayed a steadiness, an intellectual curiosity, a depth of knowledge and an approach to looking at problems like this and picking a vice president that, I think, is ready to be president on day one. And also, in not just jumping in and changing every day, but showing intellectual vigor. I think that he has a, a definitive way of doing business that would serve us well. I also believe that on the Republican side over the last seven weeks, the approach of the Republican Party and Mr. McCain has become narrower and narrower. Mr. Obama, at the same time, has given us a more inclusive, broader reach into theneeds and aspirations of our people. He's crossing lines--ethnic lines, racial lines, generational lines. He's thinking about all villages have values, all towns have values, not just small towns have values. And I've also been disappointed, frankly, by some of the approaches that Senator McCain has taken recently, or his campaign ads, on issues that are not really central to the problems that the American people are worried about. This Bill Ayers situation that's been going on for weeks became something of a central point of the campaign. But Mr. McCain says that he's a washed-out terrorist. Well, then, why do we keep talking about him? And why do we have these robocalls going on around the country trying to suggest that, because of this very, very limited relationship that Senator Obama has had with Mr. Ayers, somehow, Mr. Obama is tainted. What they're trying to connect him to is some kind of terrorist feelings. And I think that's inappropriate. Now, I understand what politics is all about. I know how you can go after one another, and that's good. But I think this goes too far. And I think it has made the McCain campaign look a little narrow. It's not what the American people are looking for. And I look at these kinds of approaches to the campaign and they trouble me. And the party has moved even further to the right, and Governor Palin has indicated a further rightward shift. I would have difficulty with two more conservative appointments to the Supreme Court, but that's what we'd be looking at in a McCain administration.

I'm also troubled by, not what Senator McCain says, but what members of the party say. And it is permitted to be said such things as, "Well, you know that Mr. Obama is a Muslim." Well, the correct answer is, he is not a Muslim, he's a Christian. He's always been a Christian. But the really right answer is, what if he is? Is there something wrong with being a Muslim in this country? The answer's no, that's not America. Is there something wrong with some seven-year-old Muslim-American kid believing that he or she could be president? Yet, I have heard senior members of my own party drop
the suggestion, "He's a Muslim and he might be associated terrorists." This is not the way we should be doing it in America.

I feel strongly about this particular point because of a picture I saw in a magazine. It was a photo essay about troops who are serving in Iraq and Afghanistan. And one picture at the tail end of this photo essay was of a mother in Arlington Cemetery, and she had her head on the headstone of her son's grave. And as the picture focused in, you could see the writing on the headstone. And it gave his awards--Purple Heart, Bronze Star--showed that he died in Iraq, gave his date of birth, date of death. He was 20 years old. And then, at the very top of the headstone, it didn't have a Christian cross, it didn't have the Star of David, it had crescent and a star
of the Islamic faith. And his name was Kareem Rashad Sultan Khan, and he was an American. He was born in New Jersey. He was 14 years old at the time of 9/11, and he waited until he can go serve his country, and hegave his life. Now, we have got to stop polarizing ourself in this way. And John McCain is as nondiscriminatory as anyone I know. But I'm troubled about the fact that, within the party, we have these kinds of expressions. So, when I look at all of this and I think back to my Army career, we've got two individuals, either one of them could be a good president. But which is the president that we need now? Which is the individual that serves the needs of the nation for the next period of time? And I come to the
conclusion that because of his ability to inspire, because of the inclusive nature of his campaign, because he is reaching out all across America, because of who he is and his rhetorical abilities--and we have to take that into account--as well as his substance--he has both style and substance--he has met the standard of being a successful president, being an exceptional president. I think he is a transformational figure. He is a new generation coming into the world-- onto the world stage, onto the American stage, and for that reason I'll be voting for Senator Barack
Obama.

The rest of the interview is here: http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2008/10/colin_powell_endorses_barack_o_1.html

BIG PIZZLE
10-21-2008, 10:17 PM
This is not news.

pauluncg01
10-21-2008, 10:38 PM
Two weeks until Election Day and Powell decides to jump on the band wagon? Isn't he a little late for that?

Insomniac
10-21-2008, 11:01 PM
He's "the good one" to go along with "the bad one" when the GOP pulls out Rev. Wright.

Morfin
10-22-2008, 09:10 AM
You don't honestly believe that, do you Insomniac? I hope you are being sarcastic.

Limp
10-22-2008, 09:13 AM
This is news? I thought everyone knew Powell was black...

THIS JUST IN: Chris Rock is voting for Obama!

UNC
10-22-2008, 09:34 AM
Powell is just as racist as anyone.

Isn't he supposed to be republican? I wonder who he would have supported if Hillary had won the nomination

Limp
10-22-2008, 09:45 AM
I wonder who he would have supported if Hillary had won the nomination
Porbably... she does have a ghetto booty.

freegood
10-22-2008, 10:13 AM
Powell is just as racist as anyone.

Isn't he supposed to be republican? I wonder who he would have supported if Hillary had won the nomination

He and McCain are good buddies, but I imagine if McCain ran a similar campagin as he does now (Hillary sure as hell would hit back equally hard), Powell would probably sit that one out.

taters
10-22-2008, 04:06 PM
Powell is just as racist as anyone.

Isn't he supposed to be republican? I wonder who he would have supported if Hillary had won the nomination


Yea, because hes black and does not support how far right republicans have drifted, hes racist?

Sure. He was 'a fine example of a black person' to republicans before, and now after the party has swayed so far the to the extreme right that even he cant condone their ideals and intolerances, hes 'just another N----'.

That sort of thinking coming from republicans right now is the best example to so-called black republicans of what their comrades really think of them. Figure-head tokens to be whipped out for public showings when useful, and ignored and hated behind closed doors when not.

Alcestis
10-22-2008, 04:24 PM
tater, you are one bitter person.

Sure. He was 'a fine example of a black person' to republicans before, and now after the party has swayed so far the to the extreme right that even he cant condone their ideals and intolerances, hes 'just another N----'.

How about doing 'this' Republican a favor, and STOP stereotyping me with all your racist rants.

BIG PIZZLE
10-22-2008, 09:38 PM
The Man Who Helped Drive Powell Away From His Party
Inside the longstanding feud between Colin Powell and Christian right leader James Dobson.

After Colin Powell endorsed Barack Obama on Meet the Press, Sarah Palin was interviewed by Christian right leader James Dobson on his Focus on the Family radio show. Though Palin did not mention Powell, she attacked Obama as a socialist by referencing his now famous encounter with Joe “The Plumber” Wurlzerbacher.“Joe The Plumber, you gotta hand it to him,” Palin told Dobson. “He's the one who got finally Barack Obama to say what he’d do with redistributing wealth and raising taxes. And Joe The Plumber said that certainly sounds like socialism to him, and I appreciate Joe having the boldness to get out there and ask the question.

”Powell’s endorsement and Palin’s appearance on Dobson’s show are not entirely unconnected. Dobson has long been one of the banes of Powell’s political life―and the right’s warm embrace of Palin is part of what drove Powell away from McCain.When Powell endorsed Obama, he offered a litany of factors, from Obama’s “transformational” potential to “steadiness.” But Powell, a military man and self-described “Rockefeller Republican,” also declared his disappointment with the “rightward shift” in the Republican Party.

There is a little understood, rancorous subplot behind this vague remark: Powell’s war with the religious right. That conflict began years before the current presidential campaign and, if Powell plays a role in an Obama administration, will almost certainly extend beyond it.

Over a decade ago, when General Powell, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, emerged as the Republican Party’s most popular figure, James Dobson targeted him, fearing his political ascendancy might spell doom for the party’s anti-abortion wing. Dobson’s tactics ranged from threatening conservative movement leaders who dared to praise Powell’s political potential, to devoting an entire broadcast of his top-rated radio show to attacking Powell’s advocacy of condom use. Dobson and his minions laid the groundwork for Powell’s castigation from the Republican Party. Yet by helping to force Powell into the wilderness, Dobson may have also provoked his momentous act of political vengeance.

While Dobson has not yet commented on Powell’s endorsement, his former Washington lobbyist and ally, Gary Bauer, dismissed it as an irrational act of racial solidarity. “Powell’s endorsement is nonsensical, and it leaves open the question of just how big a factor race was in his decision,” Bauer wrote in his daily email blast to supporters. Bauer, who now leads his own outfit, American Values, spent much of the 1990s building Dobson’s Family Research Council into the one of the most formidable Christian right groups inside the Beltway.

Back during the run-up to the 1996 presidential primaries, when some movement conservatives advanced the notion of Powell as the GOP’s most viable presidential nominee, Dobson moved to intimidate and silence the general’s boosters. Among Powell’s fans was the ardently anti-abortion Jack Kemp, who called him “Republican on almost every issue.” Neoconservative former Education Secretary William Bennett repeatedly praised Powell on the pages of the National Review, while Weekly Standard editor William Kristol argued in an editorial for his magazine that Powell was the only figure who could defeat the increasingly popular Bill Clinton. Already annoyed by the swell of movement support for the pro-choice Powell, Dobson was furious when Christian Coalition President Ralph Reed refused to condemn Powell’s possible candidacy during his appearance on This Week with David Brinkley.

Immediately, Dobson faxed a five-page letter to Reed accusing him of unholy motives. “Is power the motivator of the great crusade?” Dobson asked the fresh-faced operator. “If so, it will sour and turn to bile in your mouth… This posture may elevate your influence in Washington, but it is unfaithful to the principles we are duty-bound as Christians to defend.” Bauer copied the letter and blasted it out to other Powell-friendly conservatives, including Bennett, who Dobson baselessly accused of being “pro-abortion.” Shaken by Dobson’s jeremiad, Reed hastily composed a letter suggesting that attacks from the Christian right would only provoke Powell into running. The situation “required a delicate balancing act,” Reed insisted, according to Dobson’s official biography. Reed’s advice fell on deaf ears. When another moderate Republican, Sen. Bob Dole, won the GOP nomination, Dobson objected. Together with Bauer, Dobson summoned Dole to a private meeting where they harangued the Senate Majority Leader for three hours with their demands. Unaccustomed to being lectured and threatened, Dole stormed out. As soon as he learned that Dole had given Powell a prominent speaking role at the Republican National Convention―a signal that Powell would serve in his administration―Dobson transferred his support from Dole to his longtime friend, Howard Phillips, a far-right stalwart running under the banner of the so-called US Taxpayers Party. Dobson’s snub deprived Dole of crucial movement enthusiasm among evangelicals, contributing at least in small part to his defeat.

After Bauer terminated his hapless campaign for the presidency in 2000―a crusade that will be best remembered for an incident where the elfin candidate fell off a stage backwards flipping pancakes―Bauer inexplicably endorsed John McCain, a sworn enemy of the religious right. Dobson was so infuriated that he broke all contact with his former protégé, according to Dobson’s official biographer Dale Buss, who says the two men did not restore their working relationship until 2004.

In 2000, Dobson lined up behind George W. Bush, the beginning of a special relationship that afforded Dobson weekly conference calls with Karl Rove’s underlings. Dobson soon leveraged his White House influence against his old enemy, Colin Powell, now elevated as secretary of state. Powell had roused his ire during an appearance at an MTV forum in February 2002, where, before an international audience of young people, he emphasized the importance of condoms in combating the global AIDS epidemic. “Forget about taboos, forget about conservative ideas with respect to what you should tell young people about,” the secretary of state replied when asked about the Vatican’s opposition to condoms. “It's the lives of young people that are put at risk by unsafe sex, and therefore, protect yourself.

”The following day, the Focus on the Family chairman fired off an angry press release. “Colin Powell is the secretary of state, not the secretary of health. He is talking about a subject he doesn't understand,” Dobson said. Then, he spent much of an appearance on Larry King Live railing against Powell, calling his condom advocacy “most uninformed.” Finally, Dobson devoted an entire broadcast of his radio show to berating Powell, while Bauer took to the media to demand that Powell “be taken to the woodshed.” By this time, White House switchboards overflowed with indignant calls from Focus on the Family’s supporters.The day after Dobson’s broadcast, Bush delivered a speech directly contradicting Powell’s position on condoms. "When our children face a choice between self-restraint and self-destruction, government should not be neutral,” Bush declared, proposing a whopping $135 million budget for abstinence education while pointedly omitting any mention of condoms as an effective measure against sexually transmitted diseases. The Christian right celebrated Bush’s speech both as a victory for their movement and a defeat for Colin Powell.

Next, Focus on the Family demanded the ouster of an allegedly gay employee of USAID, the key foreign aid agency, which operates under the guidance of the secretary of state. “It was over the top, it was outrageous,” said former USAID director Andrew Natsios. Despite his objections, Natsios found himself authorizing a multi-million dollar grant in 2004 to an abstinence education group founded by two of Dobson’s top staffers, the Children’s AIDS Fund. In approving the funds, Natsios had to overrule a finding by USAID’s technical review panel that the Dobson-linked group was “not suitable for funding.” While USAID turned into a slush fund for Dobson, Powell remained the good soldier, loyal to White House orders. When the Republican primary began, Dobson initially vowed never to vote for McCain, tarring him during a 2007 radio broadcast as a closet liberal hostile to movement goals. But Bauer, who has become McCain’s top Christian right surrogate, lobbied Dobson to change his position. On his show this June, Dobson gave a little ground, announcing, “While I’m not endorsing John McCain, the possibility is there that I might.” He set only one condition: McCain must not nominate a “pro-abortion” politician as his running mate.

Powell might well have supported McCain’s bid for the presidency had things turned out differently. McCain yearned to select his friend, the turncoat Democrat, Sen. Joseph Lieberman, as his running mate. Lieberman, who shared Powell’s positions on domestic policy, would have made the Republican ticket the most moderate since the pre-Goldwater era. But opposition from the Christian right―especially from Dobson―threatened a fight on the floor of the Republican convention, rendering the Lieberman option impossible. And so McCain chose Sarah Palin.

One day after McCain’s announcement, on September 2, Dobson hosted his top aides, including Bauer, to discuss Palin. “This is electric for us,” Dobson exclaimed, revealing that he had sent the Alaska governor a letter months earlier congratulating her for not aborting “that little Down Syndrome baby.” Tony Perkins, who replaced Bauer as the FRC’s president, remarked that he had just returned from Alaska to assess Palin’s culture war credentials. “This was a tremendous strategic achievement by the McCain campaign,” Perkins said. “He has shown that he listens.”Dobson was finally ready to complete his 180-degree reversal. “I am moving closer and closer to being able to―I’ll say it now,” Dobson declared. “If I went into the polling booth today, I would pull the lever for John McCain.”

Powell cited it as a principal motivation for endorsing Obama. “It's not what the American people are looking for,” Powell said. “And the party has moved even further to the right, and Governor Palin has indicated a further rightward shift.”On the day of Powell’s cathartic endorsement, Palin gave an interview to one her most influential allies: James Dobson. During their interview, Dobson assured Palin that he and his closest prayer partners “were rather boldly asking for a miracle with regard to the election this year.” On Election Day, Dobson’s foot soldiers will be on the march for McCain mainly because of Palin. But if their miracle fails to materialize, and Colin Powell advises the new President Obama as he has said he would, then the culture war against Powell will enter a new phase.

freegood
10-22-2008, 09:52 PM
Kareem Rashad Sultan Khan (http://www.time-blog.com/swampland/2008/10/kareem_rashad_sultan_khan.html)


http://sanseverything.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/kareem.jpg

Posted by Karen Tumulty |

Colin Powell spoke in his MTP interview of being moved by a photo essay he saw in a magazine:It was a photo essay about troops who are serving in Iraq and Afghanistan. And one picture at the tail end of this photo essay was of a mother in Arlington Cemetery, and she had her head on the headstone of her son's grave. And as the picture focused in, you could see the writing on the headstone. And it gave his awards--Purple Heart, Bronze Star--showed that he died in Iraq, gave his date of birth, date of death. He was 20 years old. And then, at the very top of the headstone, it didn't have a Christian cross, it didn't have the Star of David, it had crescent and a star of the Islamic faith. And his name was Kareem Rashad Sultan Khan, and he was an American. He was born in New Jersey. He was 14 years old at the time of 9/11, and he waited until he can go serve his country, and he gave his life. Now, we have got to stop polarizing ourself in this way.Here's (http://www.arlingtoncemetery.net/krkhan.htm) more about that young man, who was killed with three other soldiers on Aug. 6, 2007, at Baqubah, Iraq:When it came to a post-high school career decision, there was nothing Kareem R. Khan wanted to do other than join the Army.
Spurred by the Septermber 11 attacks on the World Trade Center, Khan, a 2005 graduate of Southern Regional High School, wanted to show that not all Muslims were fanatics and that many, like him, were willing to lay their lives down for their country, America. He enlisted immediately after graduation and was sent to Iraq in July 2006.
So when his father, Feroze "Roy" Khan, saw three soldiers walking up to his door on Monday, he knew what it meant.

Specialist Kareem Khan, 20, was killed with four others earlier this week when a blast destroyed a house he and members of his division, the Stryker Brigade Combat Team, were clearing in Baqouba, Iraq.

An interpreter and 12 soldiers were also injured in the explosion, the Army said.

"It's something I wouldn't wish on my worst enemy," Feroze Khan, 49, said Thursday night at his home in the Ocean Acres section of Manahawkin.

Khan's faith in Islam is important now to his father and stepmother, Nisha Khan, because they want to make sure people in America know that Muslims like Kareem were willing to fight for their country.
"His Muslim faith did not make him not want to go. It never stopped him," said Feroze Khan. "He looked at it that he's American and he has a job to do."

The last package Nisha Khan, 40, sent her stepson included a necklace that had Kareem's name in Arabic, next to the word "Bismillah," which means praise to Allah.

In the Islamic tradition, last rites must be within a few days of death. Khan's funeral at Arlington National Cemetery in Virginia is scheduled Thursday. The family will perform traditional Islamic rites at home and have a full military burial.

"Hopefully Allah will understand," said Nisha Khan.
Though his father "spoiled him rotten," according to both his dad and stepmom, Kareem was always a polite teenager, who respected his elders.
"For a teenager, he was a very obedient child," said Nisha Khan.

Feroze Khan's favorite memory is when Kareem used to wake up at 5 a.m. on weekends to accompany his dad at work at a local marina.
"Not many kids would get up at 5 a.m.," he said.
Khan was a football fan, rooting with his father for the Dallas Cowboys when games were televised. He also used to challenge his little stepsister Aliya, 11, to video games.

"He's really funny," said Aliya. "We used to play video games and sometimes we would play with my birds."

Nisha Khan said the two would spend hours sprawled out on the living room floor and sometimes Kareem would try to show Aliya how to do certain moves, and ended up taking over the controller.

Aliya said she looked up to her stepbrother and she was "really happy," when he came with her to class at Southern Regional Intermediate School during his leave last September. Afterward he accompanied her to the school book fair.
"I was proud," she said.

Kareem was a "total goofball," said Feroze Khan. The family used to send two large bags of Starburst candies in his care packages, because Kareem would pick out all the orange ones and leave the rest for his Army buddies.

He was also a big fan of the Disney World theme parks, as was the entire family. They would take at least one trip a year to Orlando, Florida, and the living room and dining room of the family's split-level home is filled with souvenirs from those trips, like a wall hanging of Cinderella, figurines of Mickey Mouse and Disney-themed snow globes.
Kareem was so crazy about Disney World that when he had a two-day leave following his graduation from Fort Benning, Georgia, the family immediately drove to Florida.

As a freshman at Southern Regional High School, Kareem enrolled in the district's Air Force Junior ROTC program. During his one year in the program, he proved to be a solid student and citizen, said Col. Michael Mestemaker.

"He was a good kid. He did whatever we asked of him," he said.

Stafford Mayor Carl Block said his "heart goes out to the family. We have been very pro-veteran in the past, and we'll surely follow this up immediately" by planning an official memorial for Khan.

Representative Jim Saxton, R-New Jersey, received word of Khan's death through Army officials on Thursday. "I express my deepest regrets for the family of Specialist Khan. His service to the Army and the 2nd Infantry Division is truly honorable. It's a sad loss for us all," he said.
Khan went to Iraq after spending a year at Fort Lewis in Seattle. He came home for two weeks in September 2006 and was supposed to be home permanently last month, but his tour was extended through the end of September 2007.

He was considering re-enlisting or going to medical school. He worked with a medic unit when he first got to Iraq, Feroze Khan said, and liked what they did.

When he came home to visit, he was happy to stay at home, even asking his mother, who lives in Maryland, to come up to New Jersey to visit.
"He has so much promise, he could've done anything with himself," said Joe Hawk, 42, of Bayville, who Feroze Khan described as a very special friend of the family.

Hawk said he saw Kareem grow from a little 10-year-old boy into a man.

"When he joined, his dad was devastated," said Hawk, "but I told him you can't fault him for that. His father raised him to give, and he gave his life."
Nisha Khan said seeing the soldier come to tell of Kareem's death was like nothing she's ever experienced.

"You see it in the movies, but you wouldn't know the emptiness of seeing them in your driveway," she said. In her grief, she blindly hit out at those bringing the news, she said. "He promised me he'd come home," she said, as Aliya held her mother close to comfort her.

"His dad is devastated," said Hawk. "Kareem was his life. A father shouldn't bury his child."
The most important thing to know, Nisha Khan said, is that Kareem lived up to the meaning of his name.

"Most excellent," she said.

Mustard
10-22-2008, 11:58 PM
Everyone who thinks that Powell is backing Obama now just because Obama and Powell share a similar skin color is A STUPID FUCKING PERSON.

Want to know why? Obama has been black for his entire life, and now all of a sudden Powell decides to back him? Why oh why didn't Powell support Obama back when he was running in the Primary, or when he got nominated, or the 2 months that has happend post-nomination? Tell me that you fucking retards, fucking tell me that!

This was a policy choice, a preference if you will, and had nothing to do with race. You fucking idiots.

UNC
10-23-2008, 12:05 AM
to tater-]

You just said in an earlier post that you may have voted for McCain over Hilary.

The only blind assumption that I can see being correct is that virtually EVERY black person in the US will be voting for Obama. That's the most racist thing I have ever heard of in my life...and you are just as much a part of racism in this country as the deepest south klansman is...just shut your dirty little fucking mouth and get off your fucking high horse when you address me, son. You and I both know there will be millions of white people voting for your fucking savior this year. You and practically all black would vote for Obama regardless of his politics, which incidently, are not that crystal clear to anyone.

Mustard
10-23-2008, 12:08 AM
Alan Keyes would like to refute you claim.

UNC
10-23-2008, 12:09 AM
I use the word virtually and practically...because I'm sure there will be a few that don't vote obama.

Mustard
10-23-2008, 12:18 AM
Yeah, I got that already.

My point that was buried in my statement was that Alan Keyes is a Republican, and Barack Obama is a Democrat.

So that my thoughts aren't misunderstood: I don't think it should come as any shock or surprise to any person that hypothetically had Barack Obama been running as a Republican he would have had a worse chance gaining the GOP nomination. I don't think it should come as any shock or surprise to any person that hypothetically had Alan Keyes been running as a Democrat he would have had an better chance gaining the Democrat's nomination.

Of course, this is all speculation, and is more or less a complete and utter waste of time that will benefit no person. Anyone care to challenge my assertions though?

UNC
10-23-2008, 12:20 AM
I'm sure that if Powell had ran in 2000 that we'd have been a nation of black republicans

Mustard
10-23-2008, 12:23 AM
Unfortunately, I am not so sure about that. However, I would have voted for him, because I respect Colin Powell, most of his views, and the service he has provided to our country. Pretty much the exact same way I felt in 2000 about John McCain, who coincidentally, there is a better than average chance I would have voted for him over Al Gore. That is unless he had picked a Sarah Palin-esque type for VP...

Oh, and I'm secretly a reverse racist... I mean, I'm voting Obama, clearly there is a track record.

UNC
10-23-2008, 12:32 AM
If you don't think there is a blind alligience by blacks to vote for Obama regardless of his political views...I really can't continue this discussion. Most of the blacks I know will flat out tell you they are voting for him because he's black.

Mustard
10-23-2008, 12:37 AM
If you can show me where I disputed that claim, (blacks voting primairly for obama because he is black) then I would be more than grateful.

UNC
10-23-2008, 12:41 AM
If you don't dispute that claim then its hard to dismiss that Powell is capable of the same reasoning.

Mustard
10-23-2008, 01:16 AM
Postulating that claim is ignorant as fuck, and if you give it any serious though without dismissing it as fundamentally retarded and flat out unwarranted or ill-conceived, then there probably is no hope for you.

Obama has been black for his entire life, and now all of a sudden Powell decides to back him? Why oh why didn't Powell support Obama back when he was running in the Primary, or when he got nominated, or the 2 months that has happend post-nomination? Tell me that you fucking retards, fucking tell me that!

This was a policy choice, a preference if you will, and had nothing to do with race.
Ya dig?

UNC
10-23-2008, 01:19 AM
So...who did he support during the primary?

hmmmm?

I love his timing.

I know you'd vote for Dom Deluise if he ever ran.

Mustard
10-23-2008, 01:38 AM
So...who did he support during the primary?

hmmmm?
Nobody, to my knowledge.

I love his timing.
Yeah, because it would have been so much better for Barack Obama had it happened BEFORE the debates, where Barack Obama could have touted that claim over, and over, and over again.
I know you'd vote for Dom Deluise if he ever ran.
I don't even know who that is. Seriously.

You know, if you want to rehash and spew what Rush Limbaugh thinks, then be my guest. But just know that this line of thinking, that Colin Powell is supporting Barack Obama solely because he is black, is totally uncoroberated and unsubstantiated, and makes you appear to have the mental capacity of a person with Downs.

Don't believe me, I could give a shit really. Believe what Colin Powell said during the buildup to throwing his support behind Barack Obama. If there is any secret reverse-racism there, I certainly don't see it. But maybe thats because I use things like deductive reasoning and logic when I formulate ideas? Essentially, by making this egregious and heinous claim, you are saying very loudly that one of America's best and most respected Generals in the history of the United States is not only a closet racist, but a liar as well.

UNC
10-23-2008, 01:45 AM
I never listen to Rush.I am able to see things for what they are. Powell didn't support Obama ealier because he wanted to play it safe and not reveal his hand too soon. Don't really care about whatever else you are babbling about. If Obama wins...I will not be in here bitching about it for 4 years like all the Bush haters. We get what we vote for as a whole.

Mustard
10-23-2008, 01:47 AM
I never listen to Rush.I am able to see things for what they are. Powell didn't support Obama ealier because he wanted to play it safe and not reveal his hand too soon. Don't really care about whatever else you are babbling about. If Obama wins...I will not be in here bitching about it for 4 years like all the Bush haters. We get what we vote for as a whole.
Yeah, I figured as much.

Its hard to argue a totally ignorant topic when presented with facts to refute your vitriolic nonsense.

UNC
10-23-2008, 01:52 AM
1.Powell has supported repubs forever
2.Obama is a black dem
3.Powell supports Obama

For whatever reason, you refuse to see that this might possibly be because of race. All you have done is try to belittle this arguement by trying to insult me...which you suck at, dems whole logic is that the US is racist...but Powell being a racist is impossible, I guess because he's black? You are so full of conflicting opinions you should run in 2012.

Mustard
10-23-2008, 01:58 AM
1.Powell has supported repubs forever
2.Obama is a black dem
3.Powell supports Obama

For whatever reason, you refuse to see that this might possibly be because of race. All you have done is try to belittle this arguement by trying to insult me...which you suck at, dems whole logic is that the US is racist...but Powell being a racist is impossible, I guess because he's black? You are so full of conflicting opinions you should run in 2012.
I refuse to "see it" because its not true dude! Its just not true! Unless, like I said before, Colin Powell is actually a secret reverse-racist and a liar.

Also, you think I'm insulting you? Actually, I'm insulting this retarded line of rationale. The fact that you possess said retarded line of rationale is just happenstance.

In addition, my opinions aren't conflicting. Its called having intelligence, or to be more specific, being able to decipher the difference between an entire race within the United States, and one person who is a member of that race.

UNC
10-23-2008, 01:59 AM
<3

I've already stopped caring.

URFloorMatt
10-23-2008, 02:29 AM
1.Powell has supported repubs forever
2.Obama is a black dem
3.Powell supports Obama

For whatever reason, you refuse to see that this might possibly be because of race. All you have done is try to belittle this arguement by trying to insult me...which you suck at, dems whole logic is that the US is racist...but Powell being a racist is impossible, I guess because he's black? You are so full of conflicting opinions you should run in 2012.Your theory is foolproof because Colin Powell stands alone among moderate Republicans who've abandoned the sinking ship McCain in the name of turning the page. Surely only his race could justify such an endorsement.

Oh wait. That's completely wrong. David Frum, Andrew Sullivan, Christopher Buckley, Susan Eisenhower, Lincoln Chafee. All diehard, notable Republicans. All endorsed Obama. And these are just off the top of my head.

Your point might not be so insanely retarded if the Republican party wasn't crumbling into dust. Republicans are faced with losing not just the Presidency but in all races--in the states and Congress. Republicans are faced with being a minority as crippled as we've ever seen since the Great Depression. You want to blame all that on Obama's race too? No, there couldn't possibly be larger forces involved in this sea of defections.

Fuh Q
10-23-2008, 06:21 AM
I dont think Powell is voting for Obama because he's black. I respect his opinion, he is educated and accomplished. I repect his judgement.

I admit many black people will vote for Obama because he is black, but you cannot say they all will. Why can't a black person vote for Obama because they like his policies more than Mc Cain's? Why cant a black person vote for Obama because they think he will be a better president than Mc Cain? Why cant a black person make an honest and informed decision on who he wants to endorse, regardless of the race of the people running?

I think the people who think Powell is voting for Obama because he is black, are bitter that they're candidate is inferior, and their party is losing power and influence. There are so many reasons why that is the case, I think Obama's race is the most insignificant.

Morfin
10-23-2008, 08:50 AM
Yes, it is possible that Powell is endorsing Obama because he is black. Just as it is possible that blacks will vote for Obama because he is black. Just as it is possible that whites will vote for McCain because he is white (or, more accurately, not black).

But, in my mind, people who vote solely based on that one superficial issue are ignorant. My guess is that Colin Powell has more intellect than that -- he certainly has displayed it in the past and he certainly intellectually defended his endorsement on Meet The Press.

So, is it possible that Powell endorsed solely due to race? Yes. Do I believe that it was a factor in Powell's endorsement? Yes. Do I believe race was a significant factor in the endorsement? I would say yes, but not merely because Obama is black, but in how McCain has dealt with that fact.

Now, I answered that last question "yes," not because I believe that Powell is looking at the issue primarily as Obama = Black = endorsement. I believe it is more a function of how the McCain/Palin people have handled Obama being black and the Muslim issue. That is, he was turned off by how they treated a black man. There has been the whisperings of Muslim sympathies, there have been the issue of demonizing a "community organizer," there has been the issue of ACORN, a group that tries to register new voters, primarily in poor and urban areas, there have been the "real America" and "pro-America" comments. If Obama were not black, these issues would not have arisen and Powell likely would not have endorsed a Democratic white guy. The "endorsement" was as much endorsing Obama as it was a "condemnation" of McCain's and Palin's tactics.

taters
10-23-2008, 10:19 AM
tater, you are one bitter person.



How about doing 'this' Republican a favor, and STOP stereotyping me with all your racist rants.

How about you stop your party from its racism and racist comments (even towards their own apparently) and well talk.

If you guys dont like the way your party is going, why did you let it be hijacked by the extreme right int he first place. Powell isnt the first victim of the extreme right's wraith, McCain himself was.